Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME)

doctor
doctor talking to the patient

What is an Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME)?

An Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) is a licensed physician jointly selected by both the injured worker’s attorney and the claims administrator or defense attorney in a California workers’ compensation case to provide an independent medical-legal opinion on disputed issues. AME physicians are typically board-certified specialists with significant prior QME experience and a reputation for balanced, well-substantiated reports, which is why both sides are willing to entrust their case to a single evaluator. AME appointments reflect an experienced physician’s reputation for expertise, objectivity, and sound clinical judgment.

How does the AME process work in California?

The AME process begins when applicant and defense counsel mutually agree on a single physician, bypassing the standard California QME panel selection process. The mutually selected physician — selected for specialty fit to the disputed issues, whether musculoskeletal, neurological, psychiatric, or otherwise — reviews the medical records, imaging, and prior treatment, performs a comprehensive examination, and issues a medical-legal report addressing diagnosis, causation, apportionment, work restrictions, future medical care, and permanent impairment. Because both parties have consented to the evaluator, the AME’s findings are typically given strong evidentiary weight before the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB).

showing ipad

What types of cases does an AME typically evaluate?

AMEs evaluate complex cases where both sides want a single trusted expert. Examples vary by specialty: orthopaedic AMEs handle cervical and lumbar spine disorders, joint replacements, complex fractures, and post-surgical complications; psychiatric and psychological AMEs handle disputed psyche claims, PTSD, and stress-related conditions; neurological AMEs address head injuries, radiculopathy, and chronic pain; and occupational medicine AMEs handle internal, cumulative trauma, and exposure-related claims. Across specialties, AMEs are also frequently selected for medically complex cases involving multiple body regions, disputed causation, or apportionment.

PHYSICIANS CONSIDERING AME WORK IN CALIFORNIA?

How much does an AME evaluation pay in California?

AME evaluations are paid under the same DWC Medical-Legal Fee Schedule that governs QME fees (California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 9795), but with a built-in premium. Under modifier -94, the value of an evaluation performed by an Agreed Medical Evaluator is increased by 35 percent, so the standard fee is multiplied by 1.35. For example, a comprehensive medical-legal evaluation (code ML201) has a base fee of $2,015, which rises to roughly $2,720 when performed by an AME. Physicians are also compensated separately for record review, supplemental reports, and deposition testimony, and further modifiers apply when an interpreter is required or for psychiatric evaluations. The full schedule is published by the California DWC: Medical-Legal Fee Schedule (8 CCR 9795).

Strong AME candidates are board-certified physicians who are experienced QMEs with a reputation for balanced, thorough reporting that both sides respect. Subspecialty expertise — whether in spine and joint reconstruction, psychiatry, occupational disease, or another field aligned with disputed issues — is highly valued, as is a demonstrated command of the AMA Guides and a track record of clear, defensible reports. Physicians who remain active in clinical practice carry the credibility and current clinical knowledge that AME work requires.

Yes, many AMEs maintain active clinical practices while taking on medical-legal work. AME evaluations are scheduled on a case-by-case basis, allowing you to flexibly integrate them into existing clinic days or dedicate separate half-days to evaluations and report work. Whether you are a full-time clinician or transitioning toward a consultative role, AME work provides a rewarding professional pivot that leverages your years of clinical expertise.

Management companies vary in support levels, but typically handle scheduling, records coordination, and administrative follow-up, allowing the AME physician to focus on the evaluation and report rather than practice management. MedicoLegal Partners acts as an essential administrative engine, handling everything including referral development across more than twenty specialties. By managing the heavy lifting of the total evaluation workflow and ensuring compliance with DWC timelines, we allow physicians to focus exclusively on clinical analysis and high-quality report writing. Our infrastructure ensures your practice meets the rigorous turnaround expectations that California attorneys demand.

doctor smiling

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the difference between an AME and a QME?
Both AMEs and QMEs perform medical-legal evaluations under California workers’ compensation, but they are selected differently. A QME is selected through a state-issued three-physician panel and a strike process, while an AME is jointly chosen by both parties without going through the panel system. Since both sides agree on an AME, that physician’s opinions on causation, apportionment, and impairment generally carry greater weight than a comparable QME report before the WCAB.

AME selection occurs by mutual agreement between applicant and defense attorneys, typically based on the physician’s specialty fit, board certification, clinical experience, reputation for evidence-based, balanced reporting, and experience with the AMA Guides. Many attorneys maintain internal lists of trusted AMEs across multiple specialties — orthopaedics, psychiatry, neurology, occupational medicine, and others — and consult opposing counsel regarding mutually acceptable candidates. The goal is an evaluator both sides view as fair, qualified, and likely to produce a defensible report.

An AME evaluation includes a detailed history of the industrial injury or condition, comprehensive review of medical records and diagnostic imaging, and a comprehensive examination tailored to the specialty involved — physical examination for musculoskeletal and neurological cases, clinical interview and psychometric assessment for psychiatric and psychological cases. The AME then renders opinions on diagnosis, industrial causation, apportionment, maximum medical improvement, work restrictions, future medical care, and whole person impairment under the AMA Guides. The findings are compiled into a comprehensive medical-legal report admissible before the WCAB.
For the physician, an AME generally involves 45 minutes to two hours of face-to-face examination depending on the specialty, number of body parts or systems involved, and case complexity, plus substantial time for record review and report drafting. Multi-region or post-surgical cases, as well as complex psychiatric matters, typically require longer review and more extensive analysis. The complete medical-legal report follows the appointment, with timing governed by California regulations on medical-legal reporting.
An AME is often preferable when both sides want a faster, more authoritative resolution and trust a particular specialist’s clinical judgment. AMEs are especially valuable in complex cases involving multiple body parts or systems, contested apportionment, prior surgeries, significant psychiatric overlay, or substantial permanent disability exposure, where a single agreed expert can streamline the process. The QME route is typically chosen when the parties cannot agree on an evaluator or want the procedural protection of the panel strike process.
A separate license or examination beyond California QME certification is not required to become an AME, but it does require a strong reputation for balanced, well-reasoned medical-legal reporting. Most AMEs are board-certified specialists with significant experience as QMEs, fluency in the AMA Guides, and a record of reports that withstand cross-examination. Attorneys on both sides tend to designate physicians who consistently produce thorough, neutral, and timely reports across many cases.
Attorneys typically evaluate prospective AMEs by reviewing the physician’s board certification, subspecialty fit to the issues in dispute, reputation for objective reporting, command of the AMA Guides, and history of deposition and trial testimony. Many firms keep internal rosters of trusted AMEs across specialties and discuss mutually acceptable candidates with opposing counsel. The aim is an evaluator both sides view as fair and likely to produce a report that holds up at the WCAB.
AME methodology varies meaningfully by specialty: an orthopaedic AME focuses on physical examination, imaging interpretation, joint and spine assessment, and AMA Guides impairment ratings, while psychiatric and psychological AMEs rely on clinical interview and psychometric testing. Neurological AMEs interpret diagnostic studies and assess cognitive and sensorimotor function; occupational medicine AMEs evaluate exposure, internal organ involvement, and cumulative trauma. When an injury involves multiple systems, separate AMEs in each specialty may be designated to evaluate the relevant components.

How do I get started doing AME evaluations with MedicoLegal Partners?

MedicoLegal Partners works with board-certified physicians across more than twenty specialties who are QME-certified or actively building their medical-legal practice and are interested in expanding into AME work. We handle case scheduling, records management, and attorney coordination so physicians can focus on high-quality evaluations and timely reporting. Contact MedicoLegal Partners to learn about available AME opportunities and how we support physicians across California.

doctor writing
Scroll to Top

Join Our Team

Name(Required)